Private land access conundrums

We try to stick with public lands on our hikes; private land often spells trouble.

In the 1980s, a week-long backpacking trip on national forest land in Colorado’s San Juan Mountains ended abruptly at a landowner fence.

On a 1990s trip to East Humboldt Wilderness in Nevada, we found all westside access trails (shown on topographic and national forest maps) cut off by ranches built to benefit from water from national forest mountains. Entering via public road on northeast side, we hiked a contour trail shown to link up these westside canyons—it was not maintained and we ended up hiking straight over the rugged ridge instead of looping around as planned.

On a 2014 hike in Shenandoah National Park in Virginia, we tried to link up two parallel canyon trails on park land separated by small sections of private land and a county road. We left our vehicle at a popular trailhead accessed by road through private ranches with National Park Service easement. After climbing the scenic canyon to Appalachian and park trails on the Blue Ridge, we dropped down second canyon on park trail ending at private property marked with red “no trespassing” signs. We didn’t want to trespass, but map showed only two-thirds mile down to public road for a loop back to our vehicle. Too steep to contour along the Park boundary. We took a cow route across green pastures—and were seen on the hill above by the farmer as we dropped towards county road. He overtook us on his ATV and gave us an angry lecture. “Don’t you people have any respect for private property?” No use discussing public access, easements, and recreational loop hiking.

In the middle of a 2017 trip to Blue Range Primitive Area in northeast Arizona, the national forest (NF) trail ended abruptly on private property—one of several holdings on the Blue River. Right past the Forest Service trail sign, a wire gate, buildings, vehicles, but no people. We hiked past the buildings and climbed over a metal gate. On the other side was a sign with a gun pointing out: “There is nothing here worth dying for.” Glad no one was home.

Private land is a strongly cherished concept in the U.S. It evolved from Roman and European law; an essay published by Lincoln Institute of Land Policy notes land ownership opportunity in North America attracted European immigrants leaving feudalism for political and economic freedom. The 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits taking of private land without compensation—a concept often argued against government environmental regulation.

In the 1600s, economist John Locke argued property was “a “natural right” from God and advanced a theory that if someone occupied and worked the land, he became entitled to ownership. Some U.S. laws might be based on this notion. Homestead Act of 1862 provided 160 acres of land to settlers in exchange for a small filing fee and five years of residence/labor. The Mining Act of 1872 allowed mining claims on public domain land subject to yearly work on the claim. Many Western ranches started with the land grants. The Blue Range private property (mentioned above) that we crossed originally was public domain land occupied illegally by settlers at turn of the 20th century who eventually got it as a grant from the government.

I feel awkward when I encounter private property that benefits from adjacent public land but is closed to the public—like a recent trek this year through the Pioneer Mountains in Idaho. We had left national forest land and had to cross a small section of creek on a private ranch to reach public land on the hillside half a mile away. (Muldoon Creek, which flowed from the national forest, was used by the private ranch for irrigation and for grazing cattle in its riparian area). The rancher told us to get off his land.

Legally, he was right. The Idaho Trespass Law of 2018 requires members of public accessing private land for hunting, fishing, or other purposes to acquire permission or incur fines starting at $300. As one boon for the public, Idaho Fish and Game Department has an Access Yes! program that compensates landowners to allow non-motorized public access. It’s a limited voluntary program with onus on the public to check with landowners, many who are hard to contact.

On the recent Pioneer trek, we also enjoyed good private land stewardship. After the trespass incident, we spent three days mostly on private land managed by two large landholdings, all within Access Yes! We hiked old jeep roads along willow-lined creeks, over ridges overviewing vast valleys, and up a beautiful canyon with Douglas-fir groves. One of the landowners has initiated conservation easements on several thousands of acres (limiting use to protect conservation values) and also funds ecological research and a non-profit organization that helps protect livestock from predators with non-lethal methods.

Cultural Christian Europeans who usurped North American land from the Native Americans, perhaps interpreted Genesis 1:26 (King James Version) in the Bible where God gave humans “dominion” as “ruling over” or doing what you please. A lengthy article on Christian responsibility towards creation points out this primitive “dominion” view has fostered and is blamed for many modern environmental ills. However, the Bible’s teaching on the earth, nature and God may be quite different than this earlier interpretation. Dominion, for instance, could mean a “transferred right”— people bear the image of God and must rule on behalf of God. They do not rule in their own right—they must reflect the attitude that God has toward his creation. Genesis 1:31 indicates God called all He made “very good” and that He still owns it. “All the earth is Mine.” (Exodus 19:5).

Perhaps we should also reexamine Biblical teaching about land ownership. In the Book of Deuteronomy, God told His Jewish people that every 50 years all land sales reverted back to original owner. This Jubilee had interesting economic, management, and stewardship ramifications since all land sales and management activity was inherently prorated to 50-year cycles; there was little incentive to accumulate massive amounts of land as some wealth investment. Land was viewed as available for human use for a time period, not a long-term lock-up or investment to reap vast profits.

Although I am not a fan of private property as a recreationist, I might have some of the same territorial instincts as the Pioneers rancher we encountered. We once owned a house with a big yard in a northern Utah. Our yard was a shortcut for neighborhoods to a church and school across the street, with an opening through our fence and a path through our yard. I was annoyed to see kids and even adults in Sunday best trespassing “my” territory.

To sum up these rambling observations:

  • Our high value on private land might be based on our territorial instincts—but I think should be balanced against value on the “commons” and some sense of land being something we did not create that was loaned to us as caretakers. The United States has both concept of private land and public domain land that is reserved for public benefits.
  • Private land near public land is an immense privilege to the private land owner with water rights, very cheap grazing rights, and little restriction on land practices that can greatly affect “downstream” users, and in some cases “exclusive” access to “their” nearby public land.
  • Our proud Judeo-Christian heritage (based on the Bible) indicates a vastly different concept with land available for short-term stewardship but not for long-term speculation and profit.
  • Programs like Idaho’s Access Yes! and conservation easements are steps in the right direction because they allow some benefit to private landowners who are willing to manage their lands in concert with public land management objectives.
  • In the U.S. there is little we can do if private landowners wish to keep the public out—which is why public land is so important. Wilderness is particularly important because it is the only category of public land whose sole purpose is for the human visitor.

Perhaps if we saw land stewardship as a sacred responsibility, and land as something on loan from the Creator, it might change how we manage, use, or share it. Even with trespassing neighbors.

4 Responses

    • Thanks for your comment. You sound a bit angry; have you been offended by trespassers on your land? I don’t see myself as a “victim”; feel quite blessed to live in a place where there is lots of public land. However, disagree with your simple view that “private land is private land.”

      The concept of private property is complex and fairly new for the human race; a product of Western Civilization starting with the Romans and applied to land tenure by European civilization.

      Most lands in the Western U.S. were initially occupied by American Indians who saw land as gift from Creator with no notion of “individual ownership.” These lands were taken by force and Indians killed off, died of European-introduced diseases or herded off to reservations. The U.S. government over time distributed many of the lands (e.g. homesteading) to individuals to “own” and use supported by publicly funded “socialist” programs such as water development/ irrigation, grazing services on adjacent publicly owned land and road maintenance. Therefore it’s actually “stolen” redistributed land that now is in private ownership and yes, jealously guarded as a “right.”

  • Lol omg. this is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever read. YOU sound a bit angry, not TTTCOTTH. Lol. Don’t trespass on people’s land. period. You have no rights and they do.

    • It looks like to me that you and MR. TTCOTTH are just out looking for people to argue with. That is not the purpose of this website or blog. I will include your comment and that will the last approved for you folks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.